Catherine Herridge is the nation’s best journalist. Look what she found out about THAT laptop…

Leave a CommentCatherine Herridge is the nation’s best journalist. Look what she found out about THAT laptop…Commentary

The IRS whistleblowers involved in the Hunter Biden tax case have revealed that the IRS, DOJ, and FBI were fully aware that Hunter Biden’s laptop was authentic long before it became public knowledge – in fact, immediately.

  • Authenticity Confirmation: The FBI had verified the authenticity of Hunter Biden’s laptop by November 2019, nearly a year before the story broke in the media. This verification was based on device numbers that matched those of Hunter Biden’s devices, confirming it belonged to him.
  • Investigative Restrictions: Despite knowing the laptop’s authenticity, IRS whistleblowers, including Gary Shapley and Joseph Ziegler, claimed they faced limitations on using the laptop’s contents in their investigation. There were instances where they were blocked from pursuing certain leads, especially those potentially involving then-candidate Joe Biden.
  • Preferential Treatment Allegations: The whistleblowers have accused the Justice Department of providing preferential treatment in Hunter Biden’s case due to his connection to then-candidate and later President Joe Biden. This included not allowing them to interview associates like Rob Walker about significant emails that could implicate high-level figures.
  • Legal and Political Implications: The revelations have sparked discussions on political bias within the Justice Department and the FBI. Critics argue this shows a pattern of protecting politically connected individuals. Conversely, supporters of the administration might point to the complexities of investigations involving high-profile figures, arguing against any deliberate bias.
  • Public and Political Reaction: The testimony and revelations by Shapley and Ziegler have been highlighted by various political figures and media outlets, especially those critical of the Biden administration, as evidence of corruption or political interference. Conversely, others have called for a broader examination of the evidence, suggesting that while the laptop was real, its contents might not conclusively prove wrongdoing by Joe Biden himself.
  • Ongoing Investigation: Despite these revelations, the investigation into Hunter Biden, now led by Special Counsel David Weiss, continues. Weiss’s appointment was meant to ensure an unbiased continuation of the probe, though this move has been met with skepticism by some who question why Weiss was not granted special counsel status earlier if there was no interference.

Was it a deliberate cover-up?

The question of whether the Hunter Biden laptop controversy represents a deliberate cover-up by agencies such as the IRS, DOJ, and FBI involves examining both the actions taken by these entities and the broader political context in which they operated:

  1. Whistleblower Testimonies: IRS whistleblowers, notably Gary Shapley and Joseph Ziegler, have provided testimony suggesting there was interference in the investigation into Hunter Biden. They’ve claimed restrictions on pursuing leads that could potentially implicate then-candidate Joe Biden, suggesting preferential treatment due to his political status. This includes not allowing interviews with key figures like Rob Walker about significant emails.
  2. Handling of Evidence: There’s documentation that the FBI verified the authenticity of the laptop by November 2019, but there were restrictions on how this information could be used.
  3. Investigative Actions: Despite knowing the laptop’s authenticity, the Justice Department’s handling of the investigation led to criticisms of slow-walking the case or providing Hunter Biden with preferential treatment. The decision to not pursue certain charges or to not interview witnesses which could lead to Joe Biden, suggests some form of protective behavior for “The Big Guy”.
  4. Intelligence Community Involvement: The involvement of former intelligence officials in discrediting the laptop story before the election as Russian disinformation, later revealed to have been actions by individuals some of whom were still connected to the CIA, adds layers to the narrative of potential cover-up or at least misinformation management.

These were deliberate attempts to shield Hunter Biden from full legal scrutiny, especially considering the potential implications for Joe Biden’s political career.